Champions of Inclusion
Key recommendations for decision-makers in sport to promote LGBTQI+ inclusive environments
This publication is a result from the Erasmus+ project +PLUSS. The acronym stands for ‘LGBTQI+ Policy and Leadership in Sport and Society’. The project aimed to enhance the inclusion and participation of LGBTQI+ athletes in European grassroots sport through combatting discrimination, addressing intolerance and establishing an inclusive sport culture where all can participate.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author (s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EACEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
We have also compiled all the findings, background information and practical measures presented here in a download document. You can download it here.
Summary
The historical relation between gender and sport created rigid expectations regarding men and women participating in sport. These expectations can make sport a hostile environment for LGBTQI+ people.
While LGBTQI+ sport clubs are often perceived as compensatory for this hostility, a shift towards a complementary approach can be beneficial for creating a more accessible and qualitative sport environment.
Therefore, this policy paper proposes recommendations on how decision-makers from public authorities and mainstream sport organisations can support an accessible sport environment. By taking on a role in stimulating and facilitating collaboration, they create the opportunity for LGBTQI+ athletes to make a positive choice between participating in mainstream sport or in LGBTQI+ sport clubs instead of a choice based on exclusion.
Glossary
Sport refers to all forms of physical activity which, through casual or organised participation, are aimed at maintaining or improving physical fitness and mental wellbeing, forming social relationships or obtaining results in competition at all levels.
Gender is a social construct and includes all characteristics, roles and expectations society connects with men, women, masculinity and femininity.
Gender identity is one’s own internal sense of their gender whether that is man, woman, neither or both. Gender identity can correlate with a person’s assigned sex at birth or can differ from it.
Cisgender refers to a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex assigned at birth.
Transgender refers to a person whose gender identity does not correspond with the sex assigned at birth.
Trans man is a person whose assigned sex at birth was female but identifies as a man.
Trans woman is a person whose assigned sex at birth was male but identifies as a woman.
Non-binary covers identities that do not fit the traditional man-woman binary.
LGBTQI+ is the acronym for Lesbian, Gay, Transgender, Queer and Intersex people. The ‘plus’ sign refers to many other forms of identification under the umbrella of sexual orientation and gender.
Heteronormativity refers to the societal belief that heterosexuality is the natural form of sexuality and the assumption that everyone is naturally heterosexual.
Introduction
Values Based Sport – Sport as a Human Right
Sport is widely recognised for its positive impact on individuals and broader society. Improved physical and mental wellbeing, community building, reduced health care costs and economic development are some examples of this impact.
Sport its importance is also affirmed in juridical frameworks such as the European Charter on Sport[1] and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[2] These frameworks establish sport as a social, educational and cultural activity. Therefore, access to sport is considered to be a fundamental right, meaning that everyone, without discrimination of any kind, should be able to participate in and enjoy sport.
It is the responsibility of both public authorities and sport organisations to create accessible conditions in sport. Decision-makers on these levels should set conditions and requirements that are necessary for the inclusive development of sport.
The inclusion of LGBTQI+ people in sport
Even though this ‘sport for all’ approach is generally recognised by decision-makers, a Council of Europe review of member states found that sport is a hostile environment for LGBTQI+ people[3] and discovered a lack of inclusive policy measures as well as collaboration between sport bodies and LGBT+ associations.
Part of the explanation can be found in the relation between gender and sport, which developed throughout history and created rigid expectations regarding men and women participating in sport.[4] These expectations reflect the cisgender heteronormative culture of our society which causes LGBTQI+ people to experience hostility, discriminatory language and behaviour and to not always feel safe or welcome.[5],[6]
- 80 % of LGBTQI+ individuals experienced homo and trans negative language[7]
- 1 out of 3 LGBTQI+ people remain closeted in their sport
- Only 8 % reported incidents of discrimination;
- 20 % of LGBTQI+ people refrain from sport due to their sexual or gender identity
- 8 out of 10 LGBTQI+ clubs/groups believe that mainstream sport lacks a welcoming culture[8]
Efforts towards a more inclusive sport environment
Throughout the years different kinds of initiatives were introduced to transform this hostile sport environment into a more safe and welcoming environment for LGBTQI+ people. The examples below illustrate this.
Besides the mentioned juridical frameworks, policy measures were put into place to realise a more inclusive sporting environment. The European Commission worked on an ‘LGBTIQ Equality Strategy’, fostering inclusion and tackling discrimination.[9] In 2022 the Council of Europe urged member states to get rid of discriminatory policies against LGBTI people.[10]
These policy measures are complemented by practices in the field such as diversity training, Pride activities or tournaments, visibility campaigns and so on. The rationale behind this is that DEI (diversity, equality and inclusion) initiatives increase recognition of LGBTQI+ identities and value each individual.[11] Furthermore, these initiatives can be an effective way of putting an organisation’s social responsibility into practice[12] and engage a larger audience of potential members and volunteers.
The Role of LGBTQI+ Sport Clubs and Groups
Adding to previously mentioned measures and practices is the existence of LGBTQI+ specific sport clubs and groups. LGBTQI+ sport organisations play an important role in the process of creating a more inclusive sport world.
First of all because they offer a feeling of belonging and a strong sense of community for athletes, knowing that they are surrounded by people with similar life experiences.[13] Athletes feel less pressure to manage their identity according to society’s expectations, improving their wellbeing.
Second, these LGBTQI+ clubs can support mainstream clubs in recognizing and tackling the obstacles that are still present in sport.[14] Things that may seem inconsequential like conversations in the dressing room about partners or children can create stress among LGBTQI+ people. Taking part in these conversations is important for long-term acceptance within the club but they simultaneously demand sharing of one’s own relationship status. Not being aware of these obstacles, causes drop-out risk among LGBTQI+ athletes, while hearing these experiences from LGBTQI+ clubs can help mainstream clubs to make such practices more inclusive.
Bridging Gaps: Mainstream and LGBTQI+ Sport are Complementary
LGBTQI+ sport clubs are often perceived as compensatory for the lack of inclusion and accessibility in main- stream sport. However, a complementary approach would make more sense in efforts towards inclusion.
Mainstream sport clubs may lack the in-depth attention to social safety and belonging that LGBTQI+ clubs tend to prioritise. Events or short-term projects for example, might lack impact in the long run. Moreover, there is no guarantee that these initiatives will provide an appropriate solution to the challenges experienced by LGBTQI+ people.
Nonetheless, they are often better resourced in terms of infrastructure, visibility and organisational support than LGBTQI+ sport clubs, who face certain challenges when organising community specific activities.
While a compensatory approach upholds the risk of contin- ued exclusion, a complementary approach can bridge the strengths of resource availability on the one hand and strong social cohesion on the other. This can be mutu- ally beneficial for creating a more accessible and qualitative sport environment and eventually, offer LGBTQI+ people a positive choice between mainstream or community sport.
That’s why this paper offers some concrete recommendations towards decision-makers in public authorities and sport regulating organisations to take on their role as facilitators of collaboration.
Recommendations for a more inclusive sport environment
The +PLUSS project[15] revealed several challenges for clubs or groups trying to create a safe(r) sporting environ- ment for LGBTQI+ athletes. Those challenges are[16]
- a lack of access to appropriate sport facilities;
- a hostile social environment and a lack of acceptance by mainstream sport organisations;
- little financial and human resources as well as public funding.
With the recommendations below, the +PLUSS project hopes to inspire decision-makers in the sport movement and public authorities to take on concrete actions and contribute to a more inclusive and welcoming sport environment.
Guarantee equal access to public funding and facilities
LGBTQI+ sport clubs can be excluded from some important activities, such as applying for grants or renting facilities. This violates the non-discrimination approach set by earlier mentioned juridical frameworks. Public authorities can especially play an important role in changing this.
Action: Ensure LGBTQI+ clubs have equal access to sport venues, grants, and subsidies by implementing explicit non-discrimination clauses.
Develop and facilitate good governance frameworks with attention to social responsibility
With the current compensatory approach towards inclusion, exclusion persists. Not every athlete feels like going to, or has the option to go to, community based activities, but at the same time it is possible that they experience hostility in mainstream sport as well. Therefore, it is important for mainstream sport clubs to continue working on a welcoming culture themselves.
The power of good governance as well as taking on your social responsibility lies in building a positive culture, making people feel connected and committed to the organisation.
Action: Develop – or facilitate in the case of public authorities – policies regarding social inclusion, anti-discrimination and positive bystander behaviour working on the welcoming environment within sport.
Need help working on good governance regarding inclusion and diversity? Check out the SIGGS self-assessment tool to.
Improve the culture of inclusion within your organisation
The possibility exists that not everyone within your organisation supports the idea of change or creating a more accessible and welcoming sport environment for LGBTQI+ people. This lack of support can be for different reasons; they could fail to understand the benefits or feel as if something is unfair.
However, they are essential when it comes to implementing new ideas and practices. ‘change champions’ could be helpful here.[17] These members can advocate for change and be an example or source of support for others. This way, they can shift the culture from within in a subtle manner. Some crucial elements for ‘change champions’ to keep in mind:
- They share the same vision as the organisation and support the change in a way that they can persevere;
- They need people and teamwork skills, being genuinely interested in others and getting them together while keeping them motivated.
- They need social skills and the ability to work in a team, take a genuine interest in others and bring them together while keeping them motivated.
Action 1: Train some members, coaches or volunteers on inclusion topics and areas to improve in sport, using the expertise of LGBTQI+ or other external partners.
Action 2: Establish open and accessible channels for feedback and concerns, contributing to the quality of your work. Listening and applying the feedback helps with monitoring and evaluating your process/progress.
Tips for dealing with resistance:
- It’s not political; inclusion means acting on the diversity that is present in today’s society, it offers you potential new members, volunteers and a more future proof organisation.
- Keep it broad; start with topics like (mental) health, anti-discrimination, respect or anti-bullying.
- Communication is key; try to discover which ideas or values are behind this resistance.
Develop or support collaboration with LGBTQI+ clubs
By fostering collaboration between LGBTQI+ sport clubs and mainstream sport it is possible to create a sport environment where LGBTQI+ athletes have a positive choice between participating in mainstream sport or in LGBTQI+ sport clubs and the drop-out risk is mitigated.
A partnership can offer a lot of possibilities for the collaborating organisations as well. For example, it could make organising events easier, because of the shared tasks and costs. Or LGBTQI+ sport clubs could be helpful partners in developing the social policies within your organisation. You could use and complement each other’s experience and knowledge, finding creative solutions. You could apply for sport grants together. And so on.
There are numerous ways to strengthen the collaboration between mainstream and LGBTQI+ sport clubs. The best ways to do so often also depend on your own experience, resources and development. Actions can be scaled up or down, depending on your situation.
Action: Ask yourself what challenges you face and set up mutually beneficial collaborations that give you the support you need.
Some tips on partnerships:
- Make it sustainable: set goals and evaluate during check-ins.
- Select a lead person: always keep in touch with each other.
- Make sure the partnership is co-created and co-led, based on the needs of both partners.
Successful partnership to get inspired
Out For The Win, an LGBTQI+ sport organisation in Belgium, started a collaboration with a local gymnastics club about improving the positive atmosphere within the club. For this, they introduced a “sportsmanship code”, heavily inspired on creating a safe(r) space.
The code was about respect, open communication, working together and so on. Once ready, the club hung it everywhere, slightly changed depending on the target group (gymnasts, supporters, parents, …).
Following the introduction of this code
- trainers report that it is easier to address topics such as bullying;
- the contact persons for integrity are more comfortable in their role;
- the club attracted more diverse members;
- the project was recognised and celebrated by the gymnastics federation, opening doors for future conversations.
A board member is now responsible for the follow-up of this project and further integrating it in the club.
Conclusion
Whilst short-term and one-off initiatives can be excellent ways to raise awareness or to create a moment of engagement, they don’t necessarily create sustained long term impacts, and they do not shift cultures.
Creating an accessible and welcoming sports environment takes time. It is a process of shared responsibility in which decision-makers in public authorities and sport regulating bodies can take on an active role by facilitating and strengthening the collaborations between mainstream and LGBTQI+ sport clubs.
Further results of the +PLUSS project
For more inclusion in sport
Our community guidelines are a practical tool for clubs that are committed to opening up sport to everyone. They provide coaches, club managers and dedicated individuals, whether from queer or more traditional sporting backgrounds, with practical advice on how to successfully promote inclusion in everyday situations.
Based on the 'GAME' framework (Good Governance, Advocacy, Membership and Events) and supported by a Europe-wide study on LGBTQI+ sport, the guidelines integrate theoretical knowledge with numerous practical examples. They demonstrate how clubs can gradually become stronger, more open and more sustainable.
Whether your organisation is just beginning to address diversity issues or is already actively involved, these guidelines will provide valuable inspiration, tools and ideas for creating inclusive structures.
The history of queer sport in Europe
How did it all begin, and where is the journey heading? This research report, produced by the German Sport University Cologne in collaboration with partners from the PLUSS project, offers an in-depth exploration of the past and future of LGBTIQ+ sports in Europe.
It reveals how queer sports organisations emerged, the challenges they overcame, and the opportunities available today. Interviews with community activists, surveys and research results demonstrate the commitment, courage and passion behind this movement.
Alongside this, an illustrated story inspired by the research report creatively recounts the development of queer sport as an illustrated timeline, graphic novel, or a combination of images and narratives. It vividly and accessibly captures the emotions, moments and successes of the queer sports community.
Imprint
Champions of Inclusion
Key recommendations for decision-makers to promote an LGBTQI+ inclusive sporting environment
2025
Author
Sportieq & Out For The Win
For more information about this publication please visit www.eglsf.info or contact the project coordinator via eglsf@eglsf.info or michele.mommi@eglsf.info
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author (s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EACEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
Appendix
[1]
Council of Europe. (2022). Revised European Sports Charter. Link to the publication
[2]
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1966). Link to the publication
[3]
Council of Europe. (2019). Combating discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in the member states of the Council of Europe: A review of Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)5 of the Committee of Ministers. Link to the publication
[4]
Phipps, C. (2021). Thinking beyond the binary: barriers to trans participation in university sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(1)1, 81-96. Link to the publication
[5]
Hartmann-Tews, I., Menzel, T. & Braumüller, B. (2022). Experiences of LGBTQ people in sport in Europe: the influence of societal, organisational and individual factors. In I. Hartmann-Tews (Ed.) Sport, identity and inclusion in Europe (pp. 26-41). . Routledge. Link to the publication
[6]
Storr, R., Nicholas, L. Robinson, K., & Davies, C. (2021): "Game to play?": Barriers and facilitators to participation in sport and physical activity for young people with diverse sexualities and gender identities, Sport, Education and Society. Link to the publication
[7]
Menzel, T., Braumüller, B., & Hartmann-Tews, I. (2019). The Relevance of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Sport in Europe. Results of the Outsport survey. Cologne: German Sport University Cologne, Institute for Sociology and Gender Studies. Link to the publication
[8]
Braumüller, B., Schlunski, T., & Hartmann-Tews, I. (2025). PLUSS. Research report on the history of LGBTQI+ sport in Europe. German Sport University Cologne. Link to the publication
[9]
European Commission. (2020). LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Link to the publication
[10]
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2022). Combating the rise of hatred against LGBTI people in Europe. Link to the publication
[11]
Russen, M., & Dawson, M. (2023). What should come first? An exploration of diversity, equity and inclusion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. Link to the publication
[12]
Fleischman, D., Mulcahy, R., English, P., Florence, E., de Villiers Scheepers, R. & Rönnberg, M. (2024). Why does my team wear rainbow jerseys? Exploring the impact of DEI messages on sports fans' reactions. Australasian Marketing Journal, 32(3), 212-222. Link to the publication
[13]
R. Storr & J. Richards. (2024). "The tennis club is my safe place": Assessing the positive impact of playing tennis on LGBT+ people in Australia. Sport, Education and Society, 29:5, 521-534. Link to the publication
[14]
Müller, J., & Böhlke, N. (2022). "I somehow had the feeling that I didn't belong there" - Experiences of gay and lesbian recreational athletes in German sports clubs. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure (5), 337-357. Link to the publication
[15]
Find out more about the project: +PLUSS PROJECT - EGLSF.info
[16]
Braumüller, B., Schlunski, T. & Hartmann-Tews, I. (2025). PLUSS. Research report on the history of LGBTQI+ sport in Europe. German Sport University Cologne. Link to the publication
[17]
Warrick, D. D. (2009). Developing Organisation Change Champions. OD practitioner, 41(1). Link to the publication










